How we'll win
We are not building New York's subway in the desert. We are building the political coalition and policy consensus that makes the right next projects possible.
A New York–style subway is not in the cards for the Las Vegas Valley. The land-use pattern is wrong, the population density is wrong, and the federal funding climate is wrong. Pretending otherwise wastes everyone’s time.
But there are achievable wins on the table right now: defend RTC The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada. It runs the Valley's bus network, plans regional roads and freeways, and distributes federal transportation money. Governed by elected officials from Clark County, Las Vegas, Henderson, North Las Vegas, Boulder City, and Mesquite. operations through 2028, deliver the Maryland Parkway BRT Bus Rapid Transit — high-frequency bus service in dedicated lanes with traffic-signal priority, off-board fare payment, and rail-quality stations. Roughly half the cost of light rail with similar capacity. , advance the Charleston Boulevard corridor, and lay the political groundwork for a regional rail spine over the next decade. Doing those things requires a constituency we don’t currently have. Building that constituency is the work.
Our strategy has five parts.
Build a constituency through public outreach
LVBT does not have a vote on the RTC board, in the Legislature, or on any city council. What we have is the ability to talk to people — riders, neighbors, students, business owners, faith communities, labor — and convert support for transit from a vague preference into an organized political force.
That looks like:
- Social media campaigns explaining what’s at stake and how the Valley works
- Conversations on the bus, on campus, and in front of grocery stores
- Stop-by-stop accountability projects modeled on Pittsburgh, Atlanta, and San Francisco
- Annual State-of-Transit-style accountability reporting that the press can actually use
Make friends
In order to achieve our vision, we’re going to have to make a lot of friends with a lot of people in a lot of places. The natural coalition includes:
- Culinary Workers Union Local 226 — tens of thousands of hospitality workers depend on the bus
- ATU Local 1637 — RTC operators
- Sierra Club Southern Nevada and Nevada Conservation League — climate goals run through transit
- UNLV and CSN — workforce and student transit needs
- Healthcare systems along BRT corridors
- Faith communities with bus-riding congregations
- Business allies — downtown property owners, Strip employers, Brightline West
Coalition is unglamorous, slow, and decisive. We start now.
Advocate for state and federal investment
Nevada is one of the only states in the country whose Nevada's gas-tax system. The state constitution restricts gas-tax revenue to roads and highways, explicitly excluding transit operations — one of the only such restrictions in the country. explicitly excludes transit. Changing that — through A tax or fee legally locked to a specific purpose, like transit. Once enacted it can't be diverted to general government spending. The political holy grail of stable transit funding. , Changing how existing transportation dollars get split between modes (roads, transit, biking) or jurisdictions. Less politically heavy than a new tax, but limited by the size of the existing pie. , or a new The legal power for RTC to put a transit sales-tax measure on the ballot. Nevada law currently restricts this; granting the authority is a prerequisite to a Maricopa- or Wake-style voter-approved transit tax. — is the long arc of state advocacy.
In the short arc:
- Build standing relationships with the legislators who actually move transit bills — starting with the ones representing the Valley’s most transit-dependent districts
- Cooperate with state interim committees The legislative bodies that meet between Nevada's biennial sessions. They draft bills, hold hearings, and shape what will reach the floor when the next session opens. that touch transportation, housing, and revenue
- Work with Nevada’s federal delegation (Senators Cortez Masto and Rosen, Representatives Titus, Horsford, Lee, Amodei) to bring federal transit money home — IIJA The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 — the federal infrastructure law that funds bridges, highways, transit, broadband, and water systems through 2026. , Reconnecting Communities A federal program that funds local efforts to reconnect neighborhoods divided by past highway construction — capping freeways, replacing them with boulevards, or restoring street grids. , and the FTA Capital Investment Grants The Federal Transit Administration's largest competitive grant program — the main federal source for building new light rail, BRT, and major transit expansions. Funds roughly half a typical project. program
- Show up at the RTC board, the Southern Nevada Strong steering process, and municipal planning hearings
Advocate for better land use
A transit project is only as useful as the land around its stations. Fixing the bus is not enough if the entire corridor is parking lots and one-story strip retail.
That means:
- Pushing transit-oriented zoning Land-use code that lets housing, shops, and offices sit close enough to a station to actually use it. Often paired with reduced parking requirements and height bonuses near transit stops. along Maryland Parkway, Charleston, Boulder Highway, and other planned corridors
- Reducing parking minimums Local rules that force every business to build a certain number of parking spaces. They drive up construction costs, eat developable land, and make walkable retail mathematically impossible. where they constrain affordable housing and walkable retail
- Partnering with cooperative developers who want to build the mixed-use buildings the current code doesn’t easily allow
- Supporting infill density Building more housing and commercial space on already-developed land — using existing water, power, and roads — instead of sprawling onto raw desert at the metro's edge. that the existing infrastructure can already serve
Fill the gaps agencies can’t
Public agencies have legitimate constraints. Staff at RTC, the City, and the County often see what needs to happen and can’t directly champion it without the press or their bosses getting on them. Elected officials need political cover to take votes their constituents don’t yet realize they want.
LVBT exists outside those constraints. We can do the public-facing work that municipal staff cannot — articulate a vision, name what’s broken, build the coalition, and give legislators something to point to as evidence of public demand. That’s what an advocacy organization is for. It’s the role we intend to play.
What we are not
- We are not a transit agency. We do not run buses.
- We are not anti-car. We are anti-car-dependence. Plenty of LVBT supporters own cars and will continue to. The point is choice.
- We are not partisan. Transit advocacy in Nevada has won under Republican and Democratic administrations alike; the Valley’s transit problem isn’t a left-right problem.
- We are not in this for one session. The 2027 fight is urgent, but the work continues through 2029, 2031, and beyond.
Frankly, we don’t know if this strategy works on the timeline that matters. We’re going to push for it anyway.